Texas, U.S. · 22 weeksInterbank Messaging and Resilience Program
U.S. Southwest · 18 weeksPCI DSS 4.0.1 Transition for a Payments Processor
Austin, Texas · 14 weeksSOC 2 Type II Readiness for an HR PlatformCustomers ask for SOC 2, ISO certificates, FedRAMP and now a straight answer on AI. We build the governance behind those answers, assess it and test the technology.
We help you choose the assurance your buyers recognize, build controls that operate, and test the AI they describe.
For SOC reports and ISO certificates, we take you from readiness to a clean result with the CPA firm or certification body that signs it.
Each has its own page and method. HITRUST readiness sits beside them.
AI management systemsAn AI management system mapped to the NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act.
Explore
Trust servicesWalk into fieldwork with every control already tested.
Explore
Financial reporting controlsFor processing that affects customers’ financial statements.
Explore
Management systemsSecurity, privacy and continuity systems built for daily use.
Explore
US federal cloudBoundary, documentation and control readiness for authorization.
Explore
AWS · Azure · Google CloudIdentity, exposure and logging reviewed as actually used.
ExploreFrameworks that decide how AI is governed, and testing that shows whether safeguards hold.
Govern, Map, Measure and Manage, plus the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1). Voluntary, and increasingly the vocabulary US buyers expect.
The Digital Omnibus moved most high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 (Annex III) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I). Classification decides what applies to you.
Control requirements plus recurring adversarial testing for AI agents, revised quarterly.
Adversarial testing of models, agents and the applications around them, under agreed rules of engagement.
Most AI vulnerabilities are architecture decisions made before the first prompt.
The management system that ties these five services together and carries you to certification.
Explore ISO/IEC 42001Readiness for contractors handling controlled unclassified information, with the evidence a C3PAO needs to certify you at Level 2.
Level 2 aligns to the 110 requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2. CMMC clauses began appearing in DoD contracts on 10 November 2025, and C3PAO certification becomes the default for Level 2 contracts from 10 November 2026.
Level 2 certification assessments are performed by authorized C3PAOs; Level 3 by the government.
The fastest route to a deal is the assurance your customer recognizes.
| If the question comes from… | They usually want | Issued by |
|---|---|---|
| US enterprise security reviews | SOC 2 Type II | Licensed CPA firm |
| Customers’ financial auditors | SOC 1 Type II | Licensed CPA firm |
| International procurement | ISO/IEC 27001 | Accredited certification body |
| Buyers asking about AI | ISO/IEC 42001 | Accredited certification body |
| US federal agencies | FedRAMP | FedRAMP, on a 3PAO assessment |
| US defense contractors | CMMC | Self-assessment, a C3PAO or the government |
| US healthcare | HITRUST | HITRUST, via an Authorized External Assessor |
Need more than one? One evidence model, several frameworks
For SOC reports and ISO certificates, we take you from readiness to a clean result with the CPA firm or certification body that signs it.
With a single control set. Access, change and vendor controls underpin SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001 and 42001 alike; then we add AI-specific elements.
It adds model behavior: prompt injection, jailbreaks, leakage and unsafe agent actions. We often run both, because the worst AI findings combine a model weakness with an over-privileged integration.
Partly. Most high-risk obligations moved to December 2027 and August 2028; prohibitions, AI literacy, GPAI and Article 50 duties were not deferred the same way.
Yes. CMMC readiness focuses on where CUI lives. Isolating it in an enclave often cuts cost substantially.
A customer, a regulator, an agency or your board. A senior practitioner will help you choose the shortest credible route.
