Scope confirmed, not assumed
Confirmed every 12 months and after significant change; every 6 months for service providers.
What assessors look forDiagrams that match reality and a reason for every boundary.
Texas, U.S. · 22 weeksInterbank Messaging and Resilience Program
U.S. Southwest · 18 weeksPCI DSS 4.0.1 Transition for a Payments Processor
Austin, Texas · 14 weeksSOC 2 Type II Readiness for an HR PlatformA defensible cardholder data environment, every v4.0.1 gap closed and a Report on Compliance your acquirer accepts first time.
Assessors no longer ask whether a control was in place on the day. They ask whether it operated, at the frequency you chose, all year.
Since 31 March 2025 the future-dated requirements apply in full, and they are the hardest to evidence. A narrower, well-evidenced scope is the most effective way to cut both risk and cost.
The most expensive mistakes in PCI DSS are scoping mistakes. Everything downstream inherits them.
Data flows, discovery results and segmentation evidence for every boundary.
Gaps found, fixed and retested months before fieldwork.
A calendar tied to your risk analyzes, so year two costs less.
Script inventory and tamper detection against e-skimming.
The ones organizations underestimate, and what an assessor will ask to see.
Confirmed every 12 months and after significant change; every 6 months for service providers.
What assessors look forDiagrams that match reality and a reason for every boundary.
Where you choose a control’s frequency, a documented analysis must justify it.
What assessors look forA reasoned analysis for each requirement, never a template.
Every script authorized, integrity-assured and inventoried with a justification.
What assessors look forA live inventory and the integrity mechanism in use.
Unauthorised changes to payment pages and headers detected and alerted.
What assessors look forThe mechanism, alert routing and triaged alerts.
Internal scans run with the privileges an attacker with a foothold would have.
What assessors look forCredentialed configuration and coverage reconciled to inventory.
Every non-console route into the CDE, including internal administrative access.
What assessors look forAuthentication flows for each path, including break-glass.
Your acquirer or the card brands set the route. Your architecture decides SAQ eligibility.
| Route | Typically suits | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| SAQ A | Fully outsourced e-commerce payment pages | New script-attack eligibility criterion |
| SAQ A-EP | Sites that affect payment-page security | 6.4.3 and 11.6.1 apply in full |
| SAQ B / C / P2PE | Terminals, payment applications, listed P2PE | Isolation, hardening and listings |
| SAQ D | Everyone else eligible to self-assess | Often a sign scope can be reduced |
| Report on Compliance | Higher-volume merchants and service providers | Issued by a QSA company |
A guide only. Each SAQ, and your acquirer or payment brand, defines eligibility.
Turn segmentation off and watch the scope grow. Then advance the evidence cycle, open the findings and read the board summary.
Every phase begins by asking whether the boundary still holds.
Trace account data from capture to deletion; discover it where it should not be.
Test every requirement against v4.0.1 procedures across the whole period.
Reduce scope first, then fix the controls hardest to evidence.
Retest and index the evidence for formal validation.
Evidence calendar, quarterly scope checks and change reviews.
The right first step before a first v4.0.1 assessment, after an architecture change, or when you want to retire compensating controls.
Request a readiness assessmentData-flow mapping and card-data discovery, settled before testing.
Each sub-requirement rated in place, partial or not in place.
The 12.3.1 analyzes your frequencies depend on.
Owners, acceptance criteria and a date you can share with your acquirer.
One team from scoping to attestation, so findings and fixes stay aligned.
Evidence prepared, indexed and rehearsed with your team before your QSA arrives.
The right SAQ, with evidence behind every “yes” and an AOC ready to sign.
Finding account data in logs, tickets and backups, then designing it out with tokenization or P2PE.
Requirement 11.4 testing, including segmentation from every out-of-scope network.
Penetration testingInventories, integrity enforcement and tamper detection for 6.4.3 and 11.6.1.
Responsibility matrices, executive accountability and six-monthly reviews.
Every flow and boundary, with its rationale.
Status and evidence gap per sub-requirement.
Ready for annual review.
Owners, criteria and retest dates.
Mapped to testing procedures.
Scope, readiness and decisions required.
Map once, and record every difference in scope and frequency.
| Control area | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2 | NIST CSF 2.0 | DORA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segmentation & firewalls (Req. 1) | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Partially addressed |
| Stored account data (Req. 3) | Partially addressed | Partially addressed | Partially addressed | Partially addressed |
| Secure development & scripts (Req. 6) | Directly addressed | Partially addressed | Partially addressed | Not addressed– |
| MFA & access control (Req. 7–8) | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed |
| Logging & review (Req. 10) | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed |
| Scanning & penetration testing (Req. 11) | Directly addressed | Partially addressed | Directly addressed | Directly addressed |
Directly addressed Partially addressed or different evidence expectations , Not a primary objective. PCI DSS evidence is scoped to the CDE; other frameworks may require the control across a wider estate.
Terminals, web, apps and contact centers: each channel carries its own scope.
Your AOC is a sales document as much as a compliance one.
PCI DSS alongside PIN, card production and HSM estates.
Billing and booking platforms are often service providers without realizing it.
Malicious JavaScript copies card data as it is typed. It is the reason 6.4.3 and 11.6.1 exist.
Keeps analytics, CRM and support tools out of scope when detokenisation is restricted.
A listed P2PE solution encrypts in the terminal and shrinks the merchant’s scope.
Namespaces, meshes and serverless need their own segmentation evidence.
A typical first year. Later years compress the early stages.
Channels, volumes and validation level.
OutputProposal
Data-flow workshops and card-data discovery.
OutputScope document
Testing against v4.0.1 procedures.
OutputWorkbook and roadmap
Working sessions and retests.
OutputClosed findings
ROC or SAQ validation.
OutputAOC
Every proposal sets out the deliverables, the team and the dates before work begins.
Your acquirer (for merchants) or the payment brands (for service providers) decide, usually by volume and risk. Start with their written requirement, and we will confirm which SAQ, if any, you are eligible for.
Your ROC is signed by an independent QSA company. We take you from scoping to a fieldwork-ready evidence pack, so the assessment confirms what you already know.
It lets you meet a requirement’s objective with a different control, backed by a controls matrix and a targeted risk analysis. It suits mature organizations. It is not a shortcut around a hard requirement.
Tested segmentation shows out-of-scope networks cannot reach the CDE. Testing is required at least annually for merchants and every six months for service providers.
For SAQ A they were replaced by an eligibility criterion in January 2025. For SAQ A-EP, SAQ D and ROCs they apply in full. Read our analysis.
Yes. Readiness and assessment run as separate workstreams, so the advice you act on and the report you receive both stand up to scrutiny.
Share your payment channels and validation requirement. A senior practitioner will reply with a first view of your scope, usually within one business day.