Dallas, Texas · Technology consulting since 201635 services · 3 practices · 8 industries Technology in ActionPartnerships817-968-0523
FinTech & Payments · Confidential client

One Evidence Model for a Fintech Lender

Four frameworks mapped to one control set, with audit evidence requests down by two thirds.

Client name withheld by agreement
Client
Digital lending platform
Region
Dallas, Texas
Year
2025 · Ongoing
Duration
24 weeks
Scope
SOC 1, SOC 2, PCI DSS and ISO/IEC 27001
Practice
Offensive Security & Resilience

The challenge

What was at stake.

A digital lending platform answered to SOC 1, SOC 2, PCI DSS and ISO/IEC 27001, each with its own auditor, spreadsheet and evidence requests. The same engineers were asked for the same screenshots four times a year.

Compliance was eating product time, and growth into new markets would only add more frameworks.

What we did

The approach, step by step.

  1. 01

    One control set

    We rationalized hundreds of overlapping requirements into a single set of controls owned by named people.

  2. 02

    Evidence collected once

    Automated evidence from cloud, identity and ticketing systems, tagged to every framework it satisfies.

  3. 03

    Audit calendar aligned

    Observation periods and fieldwork aligned so auditors share evidence instead of repeating requests.

  4. 04

    Continuous assurance

    Control health dashboards that show drift as it happens, not at audit time.

Outcomes

What changed, in numbers.

4
frameworks on one control set
67%
fewer audit evidence requests
1
evidence library for every auditor
Weeks
of engineering time returned each quarter
Audits stopped being a season. They became a dashboard.
Chief Financial Officer, client name withheld
Facing something similar?

Let’s talk about your version of this.

Share what you are up against. A senior practitioner who has delivered this kind of work will reply within one business day.